You Requested This

I've updated the lens ratings table on the header page to the Lens Review section. Lenses for which I'm currently working on reviews—e.g., the 50mm f/1.2 S or 14-24mm f/2.8—will now be given preliminary ratings based upon my early testing. 

It's possible that those early ratings might change a bit as I get more field use of the lenses still being tested. But as the first thing I do with a lens is run through test charts and a few specific scene evaluations, I'm reasonably comfortable that a lens is performing as I've rated it. In some cases, I have to borrow or rent a lens for brief periods—e.g., the very expensive NOCT—and I won't publish my review of such a lens until I've had enough additional experience with it to be sure I'm not missing something. Thus, offering early ratings gives you a peek into what I'm thinking.

On a rare occasion, a lens will exhibit an issue in extended field use that I didn't see in the more lab-type testing. For instance, I once discovered an odd flare pattern that could be triggered with one lens, but it took thousands of images before I encountered that issue. 

Looking for other photographic information? Check out our other Web sites:
DSLRS: dslrbodies.com | mirrorless: sansmirror.com | general/technique: bythom.com | film SLR: filmbodies.com

text and images © 2024 Thom Hogan
All Rights Reserved — 
the contents of this site, including but not limited to its text, illustrations, and concepts, 
 may not be utilized, directly or indirectly, to inform, train, or improve any artificial intelligence program or system. 

Advertisement: