Nikon Z System News and Commentary
A Lot of Subtle Changes on the Site
It doesn't always show in the News/Views or reviews sections, so I thought it would be a good time to remind you that this entire site is a living organism, and in constant change and flux. Besides the 75 News/Views articles and 7 reviews I posted in 2024, the following is also true:
- In Z Camera Articles this year, I added:
- Common Camera Problems
- Sensor Read-Out Speeds
- updated several of the articles
- updated a few things in reviews
- In Z Lens Articles this year, I added:
- Common Lens Problems
- Clearing Up Aperture Confusion
- Nikkor Lens Filter Sizes
- updated several of the articles
- In Accessories:
- Updated all the battery/brackets/plates/card/et.al. sections
- Added Underwater Housings
The goal of this site is to provide the most complete, accurate, and up-to-date information for any Nikon Z System user. If you find something that needs fixing or updating, don't hesitate to drop me a line.
Also: since Nikon has finally realized that Z [space] Model [space] Version doesn't work well with search engines and causes bad line breaks, they've changed their style sheet so that it's now ZModelVersion all bunched together, I've been making that change to this site, as well. Not sure yet what I'm going to do with the books, though books moving forward will use their new styling.
What's the Upgrade Path?
Updated to reflect the Z50 II
For quite some time my general advice to those on the Upgrade Train has been to skip generations. That's tricky with the Z System, as the only cameras for which that really applies right now is the Z6 and Z50!
Z6 user: yes, a Z6 III is a really solid upgrade choice. Virtually every aspect of the camera has been improved (with the exception of a drop in dynamic range at lower ISO values). And not just improved, but improved (and expanded) by a lot.
Z6 II user: maybe the Z6 III is a reasonable upgrade choice. That all depends upon how much you value three things: better autofocus, better continuous frame capabilities, and viewfinder quality.
Z50 user. despite the similarities, yes, the Z50 II is a reasonable upgrade. The new body design and the Z9 generation goodies all transform the original DX camera into a far better one.
Nikon's missing updates (Z5 II, Z7 III) are starting to cause some concern, as we now have two cameras that are four years old. In addition, exactly where the eventual Z8 and Z9 updates (firmware or hardware) land, as well as what Nikon will do in the future with the dials cameras (Zf, Zfc), is creating additional questioning by those that bought into the Z lineup.
The past four years have been one or two new model years:
- 2021 — Zfc, Z9
- 2022 — Z30
- 2023 — Z8, Zf
- 2024 — Z6 III, Z50 II
Five of those were "new" models, and only two were updates. It seems to me that this needs to flip more, right? Nikon needs to find compelling reasons for an existing Z user to move up (e.g. Z30 or Z50 user to Z70 or FX) or to upgrade (e.g. Zfc, Zf, Z5, Z7 II, Z8, or Z9 to what?). 2025 seems to be the year we will get our first real hints at what the long-term strategy really is (or if there is even a strategy).
Meanwhile, our lens road map was lost at the last GAS stop, and there's no Google Map to replace it. We'll soon reach the "50 lens" mark that Nikon executives talked about, so what happens after that? And why is 2024 so quiet for lenses (and also, why all at a more consumer level)?
- 2018 — 3 lenses
- 2019 — 7 lenses
- 2020 — 6 lenses
- 2021 — 9 lenses
- 2022 — 5 lenses
- 2023 — 8 lenses
- 2024 — 3 lenses
At the moment at least, it seems to me that Nikon's 2024 holiday strategy is not really an "upgrade" strategy, despite the Z50 II and Z6 III. Unless, of course, you're still a DSLR user. The problem with that, of course, is that Nikon will also be trying to close out sales of the DSLRs during this season, so they'll be competing with themselves in a way that isn't long-term productive.
I usually try to give some buying advice going into the big holiday shopping season, but right now it appears that this just boils down to:
- DSLR users should consider moving to the Z System. But if you haven't already, you're going to be hard to convince.
- Z5 or Z6 owners should consider the Zf or Z6 III. And yet, for casual one-frame-at-a-time work, that might not be a particularly useful upgrade.
- Z50 owners should consider the Z50 II. A lot of changes deep inside make the difference, and the new body is better designed, too.
- Everyone else should just buy some lenses. DX users probably don't have any more to buy. FX users now have to pick from a lot of increasingly overlapping choices. Or you could get Chinese take out (obvious humor point deleted as being ethnically stereotyped).
Myself? I still need to pick up the two f/1.4 primes for testing, but Nikon is not really on my list to Santa this year. Your list may vary.
Funny thing is, I hear through the grapevine that Nikon is wondering why their sales seem to have gone down after the initial Z6 III rush. Well, simple: Nikon didn't address the viral "worse dynamic range" reports from the influencers, and other than the DSLR-to-Z and Z6 to Z6 III upgraders—some of which went with a Zf—Nikon hasn't given the others much to lust over.
If that grapevine is correct, I expect some better discounting this holiday season from NikonUSA. It may be the only way they meet their sales expectations.
Of course, there are two new Nikon cameras—we think they're cameras—registered with the governmental regulatory agencies pending. But we're getting close to the go/no go time limit for possible holiday launches (basically the last week of October). Dealers have already committed their cash to what they know they can get; they can't turn on a dime at the last minute. Moreover, given the rumors, what's currently pending in the Nikon launch queue is lower-end products, not the higher-end products that would help Nikon truly make their numbers for the quarter.
Nikon really needs to move a little further and a little faster than they have this year.
A version of this article will eventually appear in the camera articles section.
Where is the Z System Going Next?
Consider:
- The Z9 started the current generation Z architecture and design (US$5500)
- The Z8 is a mini Z9 (US$3500)
- The Z6 III is a Z8 in a smaller body with a lower pixel count (US$2300)
- The Z50 II is a Z6 III in a smaller body with a lower pixel count (US$910)
We've now traversed from the top-end introduction of EXPEED7 down to the bottom level introduction (and we've had a dials-oriented Zf thrown in the mix, as well). The prices in parentheses are current on-sale price in the US. Let's graph that:
That doesn't seem random to me ;~). It seems that Nikon has put the latest technology into four models that fit into a linear price elasticity of demand curve.
The question quickly becomes, what, if anything would you put between those price points?
We already know one, the Zf, which fits between the last two points. Will there be more?
Everyone, of course, turns to the missing Z7 III, which in theory would be between the middle two points on the above graph. That's certainly possible, but the problem with putting a near copy just under a higher-priced model is that you take sales away from the higher priced model. The Z8 has already been doing that to the Z9. Putting the expected Z7 III—EXPEED7, Z6 III body changes—into the lineup would collapse some Z8 sales.
I've heard two different approaches people claim would clearly differentiate a Z7 III from a Z8: 61mp image sensor, or Zf design and controls. Given that the Sony A7R IV+ has been on the market for five years with that 61mp sensor, the fact that sensor is not particularly well suited to electronic shutter or video, and the declining sales Sony has been seeing on it, I doubt that Nikon would make the 61mp choice. Certainly not without improving the sensor itself, which would be costly. Might as create a new sensor.
Meanwhile, the Zf dials approach makes sense for the landscape/travel crowd that tends to like the Z7, though I don't think that same crowd would like the size changes.
I've been on record as saying I believe that the Z8 II will be the camera that gets a higher pixel count sensor when that finally arrives, which would then open up room for the Z7 III to grab the Z8 sensor and EXPEED7. But I don't see that happening soon.
So we're back to the headline: what's next? The remaining EXPEED6 cameras are the Z30, Zfc, Z5, and Z7 II. I could see the Z30 eventually getting the Z50 II pass down, and a Z5 II is another (tricky) possibility, but the other two are awkward in the current Z system lineup.
My guess is that in the US$2000 to US$4000 range we get a different camera that's currently unknown. I know of a few ideas that were contemplated back during the pandemic "thinking" time (as opposed to "making" time in R&D), but I haven't heard of any them moving forward. Also, I believe Nikon's next-to-be-announced camera is not a Z at all, but something back in the compact world. Moreover, with RED now adjacent to Z, we don't have a bridge between the two.
But I look at things from other perspectives than just pure product line iteration. To me, there's currently a US$1500 price point that's not being well served. The aging Z5 is currently at Z50 II price! The Zf is discounted awkwardly at US$1800 at the moment, which is not helping Z6 III sales. To me there are three possibilities at that missing price point:
- Z5 II. Seems obvious in one respect, but do you couple the expected EXPEED7 with the really old sensor (Z5), the middle-aged sensor (Zf), or the new sensor (Z6 III)? And how will that play against the other models? What do you leave out from a Z6 III that justifies the lower price?
- Z70. Another obvious possibility, though given the just announced Z50 II, such a camera would almost certainly require a different image sensor (e.g. 26mp), and more. The question is: what would that "more" be? Is Nikon really that committed to DX that they'd introduce a fourth body?
- ZR. Z30-style body, Zf/Z6 III sensor, EXPEED7, with an emphasis on the vlogging side. Think Panasonic S9. Is there really enough market room for yet another vlogger? Will Nikon fill in the missing lenses needed for such an option (e.g. smaller, more wide angle options)?
Of course, then there's this: the Z9 turns four years old next year, and that's typically a modest bump period for the top pro camera. Some of us plan to be in Cortina in February 2026. Will we really still be using a Z9 at the next Olympics?
Nikon R&D has some tough decisions to make now. The easy pickings are essentially now over. I'll be very interested to see where they turn to next in the Z lineup.
What Did I Want in a Z50 II?
Let's get in the Wayback Machine. Back in 2021 not long after the Zfc first appeared, I wrote an article "What Do I Want in a Z50 II?" I listed a number of features I wanted, so let's see how I did:
- USB charging/power — Got it
- USB-C — Got it
- Articulating Rear LCD — Got it
- Focus changes — Got it, and more than I asked for
- Shutter speeds to 900 seconds — Got it
- Focus shift shooting — ?
- Real buttons instead of virtual — Got it
- Better mic position — Not really
So far, doing pretty good. However...
- Sensor-based stabilization — missing
- Faster focus positioning — Got it
- More than 20mp — missing
- Return of Optimal JPEG — Got it
- Better menus — half and half, didn't address the long PHOTO SHOOTING menu
- UHS II — Got it
- Lenses — Got it, but not from Nikon for the most part
- Dust cleaning — ?
- Headphone jack — Got it
So I was batting at least 11.5 for 17 (probably 12.5 for 17, but can't confirm that until I have a production camera in hand).
Two basic modes of improvement exist, evolution and revolution. The Z9 was a revolution. The Z50 II appears to be a nicely considered evolution. It's clearly a better camera than its predecessor. In one sense, the only things that are still exactly the same are the lens mount, image sensor, and flash tube. Almost everything else has been touched, even if only minimally. A lot of folk, for instance, haven't noticed that EFCT has been dropped from the Mode dial and replaced with U3, giving users more customization options. It's little things like this that make the Z50 II feel different in the hand and actual use.
What Did You Want in a Z50 II?
Basically the "complaints" all center around (with my comment in parens):
- No sensor VR. (Pretty rare at this price point)
- No higher pixel count. (It would have to get to at least 33mp to make a meaningful difference)
- No weather sealing. (Probably the one miss in the evolutionary approach)
Some also mention wanting the EN-EL15 battery, but that would make the camera even heavier and take up more internal space. A few lament the lack of thumb stick, though your thumb is now closer to the Direction pad than on the bigger FX cameras. Not much else about the camera gets mentioned, though a number of folk want more DX/VR lenses.
The Z50 II Competition
As most of you know, I'm not much of a fan of trying to proclaim one brand better than another. I wouldn't, for instance, recommend that a long-term Z50 user upon seeing the Z50 II should go running to Canon, Fujifilm, or Sony. Nevertheless, it is worth speaking about what's happening at the US$1000 price point in the crop sensor realm now that the Z50 II has revealed its details.
- Canon — The US$1000 (currently discounted to US$879) model is the R10. 24mp, 15 fps mechanical shutter, 23 fps electronic. Video is 8-bit unless you enable HDR-PQ, a bit of an oddity. Focus is to -4EV. EVF is 2.36m. Rear LCD is 1.04m dot articulating touch. The camera uses the custom hot shoe for audio connections.
- Fujifilm — There's currently no US$1000 camera in the XF mount. The older XT-30 II and X-S20 straddle the price point, both with 26mp sensors. The X-S20 is about US$300 more than a Z50 II, so it has a couple of things the Nikon doesn't: sensor stabilization and 6K video. The EVF is 2.36m with a very low magnification, the Rear LCD is 1.84m dot articulating touch.
- Sony — Here we have the five-year old A6400 at 24mp as probably the closest pairing (list is US$100 less than the Nikon, but there's also now a US$150 discount). Again we're at 24mp, but with 4K/30 at 8-bit. Again with the 2.36m EVF, but a lower resolution 922k dot touch Rear LCD that only tilts.
The number one thing I hear from people upon learning the Z50 II's details is "oh, the outdated 20.9mp image sensor." I'd say two things to that. First, the difference in linear resolution between the Z50 II and the 20%+ more expensive Fujifilm X-S20 is about 12%. That's below the level most people can discern, though it does mean you can print 2" wider. But more importantly, that Nikon DX sensor holds its own against a DX crop of Nikon's top sensor (Z8, Z9). Indeed, the Z50 II is better in dynamic range from base ISO to about ISO 500 than a Z8. It's also a bit better than the Canon R10, about equal with the Sony A6400, and only slightly worse than the Fujifilm X-S20. Put another way, the Z50 II is going to record the randomness of photons just about the same as any decent camera produced in the last 10 years.
So I don't get the sensor complaints. I do need to check sensor readout speeds for rolling shutter impacts; apparently I didn't measure them before, and I can't find anyone who has (update: a German site says 1/41 [24.6ms], which is faster than a Canon R7). But at this price point rolling shutter would be expected.
The proof is in the pudding, they say. So once my production Z50 II has arrived, I'll start putting it through its true paces. But I'm not expecting it to disappoint.
Nikon Announces the Z50 II
Late last month I wrote "I originally had an additional question in this list to answer…” Today I can reveal both the question and the answer. The question was “when will Nikon introduce a new DX camera?” The answer is today. (In my original answer I would have had a prediction date of any time in November or even December, as the EU’s USB-C charging deadline kicks in after Christmas, and the original Z50 should no longer be headed to Europe after that.)
Right up front we need to address an elephant that's now entered the room. By updating a DX model, Nikon is essentially showing a commitment to continuing Z DX. The original Z50 model Is now five years old (plus a couple of weeks), so updating the first DX model suggests that the crop sensor cameras will be around for a fair time longer. That's particularly true given that Nikon is bringing the big Z9 generation improvements to DX now.
So what exactly is a Z50 II?
Basically, a redesigned Z50. While you’ll see clear similarities between the II model and the original, the new body is indeed new: the Z50 II doesn’t have the EVF jutting out the back as much, while the front hand grip has been made a bit more hand friendly. Some buttons and controls have moved. The Rear LCD was changed. Overall, the size of the new model is similar, but more bag friendly due to that limited EVF overhang. Weight has increased substantively to 550g with card and battery (up from 450g), so the Z50 II feels "denser" than the original. And while size is up a bit in the CIPA-standardized measurements, most of you aren't going to notice the small size change.
Yes, I know you’re all screaming “but what about the image sensor and focus?” Patience grasshoppers.
The Z50 II uses the same 20.9mp sensor that Nikon has been using in Z DX since the beginning. To my knowledge, there are no tweaks or changes to its fundamentals—and yes, I asked Nikon and got responses to this question—which I consider fine, since the Nikon 20.9mp sensor has been one of the better APS-C sensors since it first appeared (and then later updated). One early document Nikon shared with me says “reduced noise,” but I believe that comes about due to better JPEG processing. Some will complain “but where are all the pixels?”, however getting back to that elephant I’m pretty sure that Nikon is thinking that if you want more pixels, you should go FX (the Z5 is currently about the same price as the Z50 II). Yes, Nikon was first to 45mp in their (FX) offerings, but they're also showing they're likely going to be one of the last to abandon the 20/24mp base models.
The sensor is not stabilized, so you’ll want to use one of Nikon’s VR lenses with the camera if you need stabilization. Remember, lens VR is two axis, not five, which tends to drop the overall stabilization ability slightly. Not all of the Nikkor DX lenses have CIPA numbers in their technical specifications for VR, but the 18-140mm f/3.5-6.3 VR DX, for instance, is rated at 5 stops at maximum focal length, while the 12-28mm v/3.5-5.6 PZ VR DX is 4.5 stops. This is not quite as good as what you can get from the FX bodies and lenses, but still should prove quite useful.
As expected, EXPEED7 takes over the processing duties, which brings with it all (okay, most) of the Z9 goodness. That includes the Z9 Subject Detection autofocus system, including the dedicated Bird mode, customizable Large-area, as well as 3D-tracking. One new addition to the focus system is a Product review mode. This is where if you suddenly hold something in front of you, the camera will focus on that, then revert to whatever subject detection you were using when you take that object away. If you're wondering what the minimum low light capability of the focus is, Nikon is claiming -9EV (with an f/1.2 lens at base ISO), which is considerably better than the original Z50.
HEIF now makes its debut in DX, as do Portrait impression balance and Skin Softening. We get C15 (15 fps) and C30 (30 fps) release modes, supporting pre-release capture. Maximum mechanical shutter speed stays at 11 fps (also 1 to 5 and 5.6 fps are available). Nikon Imaging Cloud comes along for the ride (I’ll talk about the related aspect of that more in a moment). A number of subtle things, like changing the rear LCD display information orientation when you hold the camera vertically, also come along from the Z9. Meanwhile, the LCD itself is now a 3.2” articulating display, much like the Z30’s.
The EVF is still 2.36m dot, but is now twice as bright. The Z50 maxed out at 500 nits; the Z50 II can be set as high as 1000 nits. Another internal change is UHS II support for the SD storage card (which is necessary for some of the video changes; see next paragraph). Also, the battery is now the EN-EL25a, which has a higher capacity than the older EN-EL25 the Z50 used. CIPA numbers for the battery are down slightly, but remember, this is a camera with an internal flash, and CIPA tests require flash for each image. I judge the new camera to be about 10% more battery hungry, but again, EXPEED7 is at the controls, and it is running more and faster processes.
Video gets a host of improvements, including UHD 4K/60P (though with a 1.5x crop). UHD 4K/30P video is oversampled from 5.6K, which should result in excellent, detailed recordings. The Z50 II is the first DX camera to get N-Log, 10-bit H.265, and Hi-res zoom. N-Log supports the RED LUTs as well as the standard Nikon LUT. There’s a tally lamp on the camera for video, electronic VR has been improved, the camera has waveform monitoring, and the Z50 II now sports a headphone monitoring jack. That headphone jack also supports a new optional (US$37) MC-DC3 wired remote control that plugs into it (the wireless ML-L7 is also supported). Maximum video recording time works out to be about 125 minutes, and I believe that's file size constrained (battery would wear out earlier).
Another interesting change is that the Z50 II doesn’t require Nikon Webcam Utility to stream. The camera directly supports both UVC and UAC streaming via its USB-C port, and applications such as Zoom or Microsoft Teams should immediately detect the camera. My Yololiv switcher supports the Z50 II via USB-C, which means I now have a five-camera switcher.
Next up is what Nikon is touting as the “hero feature” of the Z50 II: a dedicated Picture Control button (on the top right plate; see above) that gives you quick access to not only all the usual 31 Picture Controls (including the most recent three Nikon has introduced), but Image Recipes direct from Nikon Imaging Cloud, as well as any Flexible Picture Controls you've created. Definitely a “creator” feature, and I’ll have more to say about this in my talks at the end of the month.
Most of the Z50 features remain, including the built-in flash and the Fn1/Fn2 buttons out front. Everyone will be happy that the virtual buttons (DISP and the two zoom buttons) have become real buttons, though this resulted in some button position shuffling. Frankly, the AE-L/AF-L button, which I use for AF-ON, seems to be better positioned now.
Now for the price: US$910 body only, US$1050 with the 16-50mm kit lens, and US$1299 in the two-lens kit. The specific release-to-customer date is still up in the air as I write this, but is expected in late November. Nikon should be supplying me with an early production camera shortly, so I’ll have a lot more to say about it on my Black Friday date in LA as I start using the release version of the firmware.
That’s the body, so now let’s buzz, buzz a bit (my shorthand for being annoying about “where are the lenses?”).
I have good news and bad. The good news is that there are now 33 DX autofocus lenses available for the Z30/Z50/Z50II/Zfc quadruplets (plus, of course, all the FX lenses). From 16mm (24mm equivalent) to 75mm (~105mm equivalent), we have quite a few DX prime lens options, with fast aperture options available from multiple vendors at 16mm, 23/24mm, 32/33/35mm, and 50/56mm. So the traditional 24mm to 85mm (effective) prime range is really well covered, and a number of those lenses are quite remarkable optically, too. More autofocus primes from third parties show up every week (another will be announced shortly). (To see which third party autofocus lenses are available, check this site's lens database.)
Another bit of good news is that the FX side of the Z mount is now really well built out from 24mm upward (that's 35mm real focal length, or 36mm DX equivalent) to way longer than you’re going to mount on a Z50 II. Nikon’s 28-400mm f/4-8 VR coupled with the DX 12-28mm f/3.5-5.6 PZ VR DX would give you a two-lens set that goes from 18mm to 600mm (equivalent), both with stabilization. Tamron’s recent 50-400mm f/4.5-6.3 also has image stabilization and looks like a reasonable walk-around birder lens for a Z50 II user.
The bad news comes if you want a DX zoom lens. Or a Nikkor DX lens. Only four of the former and five of the latter exist. The next bad news: a fast mid-range zoom (e.g. 24-70mm equivalent f/2.8) doesn’t yet exist. The Z50 II really needs a compact 16-55mm f/2.8 DX VR and/or 16-80mm f/4 DX VR. And the final bad news: without sensor VR on the Z50 II, it’s really only the DX zooms, some FX zooms, and the long FX telephoto lenses that are going to stabilize your images.
It’s difficult for me to feel too buzzy about where we are with Nikon DX in the mirrorless mount, though. If we had a broader and deeper DX body choice I’d probably be complaining. But most of you are going to find a two- or three-lens kit that works for the level of camera the Z50 II is. The only truly missing option at the moment is a fast mid-range zoom that's appropriately sized.
In summary, Nikon did what we expected them to: they've brought the Z50 into the Z9 world. If the Z8 was a mini Z9 and the Z6 III was a quasi Z8, then the Z50 II is a miniature Z6 III. There's a lot of horsepower and features packed in a small, easy-to-carry body that comes in at less than one large (or ten Benjamins).
Obviously, now that the camera has been announced and I'm able to write about it, I'll have much more to say about it in the not too distant future. And don't forget my LA Day on Black Friday, where Mark Comon and I will, amongst all the other events we've put together for that special day, host a Zoom presentation to provide a fuller evaluation of the Z50 II to online viewers (click here to see the events and how to sign up).
Bonus: I've found a few other subtle touches in the updated camera. NEF files, like all the Z9 generation, are now always 14-bit, and yes, we get the High efficiency variants to keep file size small. Slow shutter speeds can be set down to 900 seconds. Surprisingly, Nikon added the voice memo option. And yes, we do get the NETWORK menu for the connectivity stuff, so that means that RETOUCH is now an i-button function on playback. Also, the Z50 II has manual focus subject detection. Customization pretty much includes everything other than Recall shooting function.
Thom’s Black Friday, Aka Thom Goes La-La
I promised excitement on Black Friday (November 29th) in Los Angeles, and here it is:
- 6am til mid-morning — Mark Comon and Thom Hogan lead a free bird photo walk at the Ken Malloy Harbor Regional park. Learn how pros approach birding, and find out what settings, lenses, and other gear might be useful. All while photographing the local bird life. Bring your camera and long lens, and be prepared to hike a bit, if necessary. Thom's bringing a Z50 II (lens to be determined).
- Noon — "Lunch and Learn" at the Creative Photo Academy classroom in Torrance (next door to Paul’s Photo). This is a free, open end Q&A/demo time where you'll get direct, in-person access to Thom, who’ll try to answer all your questions and help you deal with any photography, setup, or other issues you have. Bring your own bagged lunch or pick up something at one of the nearby restaurants, such as the neighboring Di Roma Cucina.
- 4pm — "Mastering Nikon JPEGs", a free live and streamed presentation where Thom will give a brief preview of his upcoming book, Mastering Nikon JPEGs. Understand the basics of getting straight-out-of-camera photos that sparkle in the way you want them to. If you don't think that's important, remember that Pre-release capture images are JPEGs!
- 5pm — "Nikon News and Developments", a second free, live and streamed presentation where Mark Comon and Thom Hogan will talk in depth about the new Nikon Z50 II, including presenting images they've been taking with the new camera.
But wait, there’s more:
- Nov 30 (Saturday morning) — Mark Comon and Thom Hogan reprise yesterday’s walk for those who couldn’t make it on Black Friday. Call it Dark Saturday.
- Surprises — With Thom and Mark, there are always surprises, but you'll have to be at one of the in-person events to get them.
To those wanting to participate in person, you should sign up in advance as space is limited. Those of you who won’t be in LA and want to view the Zoom-streamed version of the two afternoon talks will need to sign up in advance, as well (pick the Online session ticket). The Nikon News and Developments (Z50 II) stream will be recorded and and available to those who couldn’t participate in real time but who were signed up in advance.
Thom rarely does in-person events, so if you’re in the Los Angeles area on November 29th (Black Friday), you’ll want to consider participating in one or more of the above events. This is not Thom kicking off a nationwide in-person tour; it’s a once-in-a-blue-moon event, and one of your rare chances to meet Thom in person and pick his brain (please be gentle). Yes, you’ll have to put up with Mark Comon at these events, but don’t worry, he’ll be tired, having just flown back from a Japan tour.
The SnapBridge Problem
With annoying regularity I get and/or see forum posts denigrating SnapBridge. As someone who encouraged Nikon to include the camera-to-smartphone connection in the first place, it always makes me grind my teeth a bit every time I get or see another of these posts.
Let’s start up front: Nikon has caused a number of the issues themselves. In an un-useful attempt to save power—Bluetooth is very low power to start with—Nikon has set the rate at which the cameras ping their willingness to connect way too high (several seconds). Much of setup delays seem to relate to this decision, as it takes a frustratingly long time before the mobile device and camera agree that they’re communicating.
Even though it’s an iOS issue, SnapBridge takes you to the wrong page in Settings in order to “forget” a previous connection when you later try to set up again (on an iOS device go to Settings > Bluetooth > [scroll to previously connected device] > i > Forget This Device).
Those two things by themselves tend to generate most of the SnapBridge complaints. There are others, but the fact that neither has been addressed by Nikon is the root of the real SnapBridge Problem: Nikon is allowing users to post their frustration and annoyance with the product, when the actual problem could be addressed by Nikon. This has continued to be true since 2016 when SnapBridge first appeared. So that's eight years of not addressing issues that Nikon could control. When a company does that—go into ignore mode—they deserve the flack that they’ll continue to get every time they try to promote the option.
Android, of course, raises other issues, which doesn’t help. But let me just say it: most of the SnapBridge Problem appears to be Nikon, or at least in Nikon’s control.
I’m not seeing the Chinese have this same issue. Acsoon, DJI, Insta360, and a host of other SE Asian companies that are using mobile to device communications all connect quicker, more reliably, and provide more robust help for the few times they don’t.
But there’s a bigger problem looming for SnapBridge now.
It started with NX Mobile Air. Once that new app was able to do camera-to-mobile-device via the airwaves, we got competing pathways with differing UI and abilities (and since I’m in complaining mode: US$4.49 a month in order to create more than one album in the memory of your mobile device is ridiculous; moreover, deleting pictures already on your device if your subscription expires is beyond ridiculous).
But now we also have Nikon Imaging Cloud (at least on the Z6 III). So we have a third way to interact with our mobile device which does yet another set of functions through the air. Gee, what’s next, NX Mobile Tether?
This reeks of both the inability to understand where a camera fits into the 21st century—just swat flies with a new app when a new user need is noticed—as well as an inability to give a 21st century user the way they want to interact with their mobile device in the first place (hint: it isn’t with a dozen apps to connect two devices). This reminds me of the old debate between science and religion about whether the solar system revolves around the Earth (camera) or the sun (mobile device). The answer is obvious to those that observe, so my conclusion is that nobody in Tokyo has poked their heads out of their offices to see what’s actually going on. Cameras revolve around the mobile device, not vice versa.
Nikon’s president recently said "“We are now in an age where smartphones and digital cameras can coexist.” [source: yomiuri.co.jp] Gee, didn’t I write that in 2007 (and pretty much ever since)? This is new to Nikon?
My worry is that Nikon feels that they’re embracing smartphones by just creating a bunch of conduits (apps) that do limited things. To make matters worse, they're not investing enough to do it right.
We really only need two apps (and many would argue that they could be combined):
- Phone controls the camera.
- Camera feeds the phone.
It’s time for Nikon to stop creating new apps and make the correct one that I told them back in 2011 that they needed.
I know I’ll get some blowback on my next comment: if doing it right requires a subscription fee, so be it. However, any subscription fee needs to be reasonable, and has to be for real R&D and improvement, not just to unlock storage we already paid for on our phone.
Nikon’s expertise started and grew in hardware engineering. Thing is, by now they should have realized that the software side is what is now unlocking physical hardware to do things that would be beyond just typical hardware improvement. That’s true of steppers (Nikon Precision), it’s true of cameras (Nikon Imaging), and it’s true in every one of Nikon’s other businesses, as well.
We no longer need a bridge, we need a direct connection.
Two Cameras or One?
Now that we have people accumulating a “full” Z-mount kit, we need to return to a topic I covered in the DSLR era. That’s basically the mismatched camera set versus the matched camera set.
I’m a firm believer in spending my time photographing when taking photographs (duh). When you carry and use two bodies with you that have different controls, options, and basically handling bits, you sometimes have to think about “what camera do I have in my hand” before you take a photo.
Of course, I take photos these days mostly in sports arenas and wildlife locales. Even a fraction of a moment wasted thinking about which button controls what can mean I miss the photo I wanted. Thus, whenever possible I carry two matching bodies with me. For example, during my month in Botswana earlier this year, I brought two Z9 bodies (with different lenses), set identically. It didn’t matter which camera I had in my hand; I had no cognitive dissonance that I was fighting as I sought to get the images I wanted.
Most of you aren’t carrying two cameras and bouncing between them all the time as I am on the sidelines or in the Land Cruiser. But I’ll bet you now have more than one body. How often do you go out with a body and have that moment where you stop to think “which camera do I have in my hands, and how is it set?” If your answer is “almost never” then congratulations, you’re done reading this article (though do consider coming back to it if your answer ever changes).
At the beginning of the Z System, Nikon actually produced two matching bodies with different internals: the Z6 and Z7. Using one was pretty much the same as using the other, at least until the firmware updates started piling up. Eventually, those nit-making engineers in Tokyo started adding features to one camera but not to the other (e.g. voice annotation on the Z6 only). The Z6 II and Z7 II also stayed relatively the same, so if the two Z cameras you’re juggling are among the Z6, Z6 II, Z7, Z7 II crowd, no big worries, you too can probably stop reading. If you buy a Z6 III, however, all bets are off.
We’re currently in an era with many body UX differences. Grossly lumped into categories, we have:
- Zf, Zfc — near identical retro dials cameras at the basic operational level, though there are quite a few differences under the skin and in their extended abilities.
- Z5, Z6, Z7, Z6 II, Z7 II — on the outside, close to identical, though again you might find some differences under the skin once you go beyond the basic handling bits.
- Z30, Z50 — while similar to the cameras in the bullet just above, there are more operational differences that come into play for basic photography controls.
- Z6 III, Z8, Z9 — the current design standard at Nikon started with the Z9 and worked its way down currently to the Z6 III. While physically these cameras are different, the way you control them is remarkably similar, enough so that using any two of these bodies together can be done by aligning the controls you’re using.
Things aren’t currently as bad as they became at times in the DSLR era, but serious photographers still need to pay attention to this, lest they find themselves in the field trying to figure out why something isn’t working the way they thought it should, only to discover it’s because they’re using a different camera.
I’m a firm believer in “master what you have,” so if you haven’t already done that with your current camera(s), buying another that’s in a different group and has not only different controls but different features is asking for trouble. It’s like trying to pass Calculus before you’ve completed Algebra.
One reason why people buy a new camera is that they think they’re missing out on something, because those new features and performance that’s marketed sound real good to where they are. But again, they were likely still in the middle of an Algebra class, so trying to do the advanced Calculus stuff becomes a pretty giant, and usually frustrating, leap.
That said, Nikon clearly has a new base set that originated with the Z9 and now is in three models. If you’re considering moving to a Z6 III from an earlier camera, for instance, make sure you’re ready for the change. Also, don’t expect to be juggling your Z6 and Z6 III back and forth without getting discombobulated.
Nowhere is the current situation more problematic than with the person who bought into the Z6/Z7 dichotomy in the first place, opting for a 24mp and 45mp camera. If you’re trying to stay current, for instance, a Z6 III and a Z7 II are two very different cameras in control, personality, features, performance, and a host of other bits. You will experience the “which camera am I holding” issue at some point, guaranteed.
Most of you reading this will dismiss my thesis. You’ll claim that either (1) you never experience those dissonant moments; or (2) you’ve never lost a photo op to the dissonance. If that’s your claim, you’re either (a) operating with such diligence and discipline that having faster and better access to features and control don’t matter; or (b) ignoring the data in front of you. If you’re a 1a, great, you, too, can now stop reading. But I’ll bet that most of you are a 2b, and I think you should be a not 2b. Watch out for those slings and arrows ;~).
Too often I find folk lusting for the best new gear when something else is what they should be pursuing. A common question I get from someone coming to my African workshops for the first time is “should I rent a Z9?” To go with the Z7 you’re bringing as a second body? Probably not. Learning the ins and outs of the Z9 isn’t trivial, as the massive size of my book on it should suggest. If you do manage to master that, the Z7 will feel “wrong” every time you pick it up, so you’ll stop picking it up.
Since we’re coming into the buying season and a lot of you are contemplating picking up one of the new bodies, I’d challenge you to rationalize your system a bit. If you’re opting to move into the Z6 III, Z8, Z9 class for the first time, are you really comfortable with having your backup being different? It’s okay to say “I’ll just use the one, new camera.” But it becomes questionable if you think “I’m going to use the new and old one side by side.”
As much as features, you have to think about UX (user experience). Simply put, a Z6 III is a different user experience than a Z6 or Z6 II. Make sure you’re ready for that.
Bonus: It’s not that Nikon is the only one with this problem. I actually think Sony is the current worst offender, mostly because they’ve put out so many generations and have kept the older models on the market so long in order to fill lower price points. I watched someone at a store recently opt simultaneously for an A7 Mark IV and an A7 Mark II as a backup, thinking that they’re both A7’s. Boy are they going to be surprised.
What I write above is also something that the camera companies keep getting wrong with their small camera options, too. Most of us serious photographers also want a carry-everywhere camera. Wouldn’t it be great if that had basically the same UX, only slimmed down? Nope. Must have different UX. Management say self competition bad. Only new customer for compact. (Hmm, I seem to have suddenly channeled stereotypical Tarzan, give me a moment…)
Fujifilm currently comes the closest to what serious photographers want. X100, XF bodies, GFX bodies, they all (mostly) share the same UX. Or rather, you can buy an X100, XF, and GFX that have very similar UX; you can also buy an X-S20 and mess that up some, because dials disappear ;~). Despite my snide bits here, again, Fujifilm is doing mostly the right thing.
Heck, even Leica is now starting to do the same, at least if you ignore the M series. The SL3, Q3, and D-Lux8 now have a fairly consistent, and very modern, UX.
So where’s Canon, Nikon, and Sony? Still in the “compacts must be different” thinking.